Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Enquiry Reference: 645- 24
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
The below table contains the volume of crimes recorded and validated in the last 3 financial years which included ‘TikTok’ in the MO comments. The analyst used various spelling/capitalisation to cover possible errors.
‘Tiktok’ appearing in the MO comments does not necessarily mean it was an element in the offence but purely that the word was featured In the comments.
To note the analyst has provided full months rather than from April 6th as this would not be valid data wise as we report on full months.
2021/2022 |
2022/2023 |
2023/2024 |
72 |
98 |
107 |
1a) What were the nature of offences for 2023/24 only?
By ‘nature of the offence’ we have interpreted this to mean ‘crime type’.
The below contains the volume of crimes by crime type for those recorded in the financial year 2023/24 only.
Crime Type |
Volume |
8L - Harassment |
32 |
8R - Malicious Communications |
12 |
8Q - Stalking |
11 |
66 - Other Offences against the State and Public Order |
10 |
86 - Obscene Publications, etc. and Protected Sexual Material |
10 |
88A - Sexual Grooming |
5 |
105A - Assault Without Injury |
4 |
35 - Blackmail |
4 |
88C - Other Miscellaneous Sexual Offences |
4 |
8N - Assault with Injury |
3 |
9A - Public Fear Alarm or Distress |
3 |
21 - Sexual Activity involving a Child under 13 |
3 |
19C - Rape of a Female aged 16 and over |
2 |
36 - Kidnapping |
1 |
58A - Criminal Damage to a Dwelling |
1 |
58C - Criminal Damage to a Vehicle |
1 |
5E - Endangering Life |
1 |
Grand Total |
107 |
1b) What police action was taken for offences in 2023/24 only?
By ‘police action taken’ we have interpreted this to mean the ‘outcome of the crime’.
The outcome of the crimes in 2023/24 are below.
Outcome |
Volume |
1: Charged |
6 |
11: Named suspect below age of criminal responsibility |
2 |
14: Victim declines/unable to support action to identify offender |
7 |
15: CPS - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
1 |
15: Police - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
8 |
16: Victim declines/withdraws support - named suspect identified |
33 |
18: Investigation complete no suspect identified |
36 |
21: Police - named suspect, investigation not in the public interest |
5 |
New |
9 |
Grand Total |
107 |
Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The Freedom of Information Code of Practice (see below link) states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced. Public authorities are not obliged to accept internal reviews after this date.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-code-of-practice
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker