FOI 236-24 Drink-Drug Driving
Enquiry Reference: 236 - 24
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
The amount of people you arrested on suspicion of drink-driving between January 1st 2021 - December 31st 2021.
The amount of people you arrested on suspicion of drink-driving between January 1st 2022 - December 31st 2022.
The amount of people you arrested on suspicion of drink-driving between January 1st 2023 - December 31st 2023.
The amount of people you arrested on suspicion of drug-driving between January 1st 2021 - December 31st 2021.
The amount of people you arrested on suspicion of drug-driving between January 1st 2022 - December 31st 2022.
The amount of people you arrested on suspicion of drug-driving between January 1st 2023 - December 31st 2023.
In the below table there is a breakdown of the custody data where the arrest description type either relates to ‘Drink driving’ or ‘Drug driving’. Both are for the time periods requested.
|
Driving Under the influence |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
|
Drink Driving |
549 |
572 |
581 |
|
Drug Driving |
917 |
762 |
695 |
Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The APP College of Policing guidance states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced.
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker