Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Enquiry Reference: FOI 242-24
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
Restraining orders
Crime Type |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
008/31 - Breach of restraining order |
314 |
308 |
356 |
317 |
273 |
243 |
1811 |
066/38 - Breach of a Restraining Order issued on acquittal. Protection from Harassment Act 1997 SS 5A(2) &5(5) & (6). |
7 |
12 |
13 |
15 |
8 |
2 |
57 |
Grand Total |
321 |
320 |
369 |
332 |
281 |
245 |
1868 |
No further action is not an outcome we can search on this. Below is a table containing all outcomes of the above crimes, some are still being investigated. Those in blue are positive outcomes.
Outcomes |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
1: Charged |
142 |
135 |
167 |
148 |
126 |
118 |
836 |
1: Summonsed/postal requisition |
11 |
16 |
14 |
21 |
13 |
4 |
79 |
1A: Alternate offence charged |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
5: Offender has died |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
9: CPS - prosecution not in public interest |
4 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
12 |
10: Police - formal action not in public interest |
10 |
7 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
30 |
12: Named suspect too ill to prosecute |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
8 |
14: Victim declines/unable to support action to identify offender |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
15: CPS - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
22 |
12 |
19 |
20 |
12 |
6 |
91 |
15: Police - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
38 |
51 |
82 |
78 |
101 |
98 |
448 |
16: Victim declines/withdraws support - named suspect identified |
91 |
93 |
72 |
53 |
18 |
4 |
331 |
18: Investigation complete no suspect identified |
|
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
4 |
20: Other body/agency has investigation primacy |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
21: Police - named suspect, investigation not in the public interest |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
6 |
Grand Total |
321 |
320 |
369 |
332 |
275 |
234 |
1851 |
Domestic violence protection orders
Crime Type |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
Breaches of domestic violence protection orders |
- |
- |
- |
23 |
46 |
40 |
109 |
Crime Type |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
NFA Breaches of domestic violence protection orders |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
9 |
7 |
22 |
Crime Type |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
Breaches of domestic violence protection orders upheld |
- |
- |
- |
17 |
37 |
33 |
87 |
Non-molestation orders
Crime Type |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
066/39 - Breach of non-molestation order |
262 |
327 |
411 |
414 |
337 |
247 |
1998 |
No further action is not an outcome we can search on this. Below is a table containing all outcomes of the above crimes, some are still being investigated. Those in blue are positive outcomes.
Outcome of the crime |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
1: Charged |
92 |
107 |
104 |
120 |
98 |
71 |
592 |
1: Summonsed/postal requisition |
8 |
10 |
19 |
28 |
18 |
3 |
86 |
1A: Alternate offence charged |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
3: Adult caution |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
5: Offender has died |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
9: CPS - prosecution not in public interest |
1 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
10 |
10: Police - formal action not in public interest |
5 |
2 |
7 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
26 |
13: Named suspect but victim/key witness deceased or too ill |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
14: Victim declines/unable to support action to identify offender |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
15: CPS - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
24 |
22 |
54 |
39 |
20 |
9 |
168 |
15: Police - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
44 |
66 |
140 |
154 |
174 |
140 |
718 |
16: Victim declines/withdraws support - named suspect identified |
85 |
112 |
82 |
56 |
20 |
2 |
357 |
20: Other body/agency has investigation primacy |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
21: Police - named suspect, investigation not in the public interest |
1 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
8 |
Grand Total |
262 |
327 |
411 |
414 |
333 |
227 |
1974 |
Stalking protection orders
Crime Type |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
008/74 - Breach of Stalking Order/Interim Stalking Order |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
6 |
Outcome of crime |
2023 |
15: Police - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
3 |
Outcome of crime |
2023 |
Charged |
3 |
Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The APP College of Policing guidance states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced.
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker