Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Enquiry Reference: 284 - 24
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request, Below is your request and our response.
1a) How many reports of indecent exposure did your police force record as crimes in 2020?
b) What was the outcome of each of these reports (Home Office Outcome)
2a) How many reports of indecent exposure did your police force record as crimes in 2021?
b) What was the outcome of each of these reports (Home Office Outcome)
3a) How many reports of indecent exposure did your police force record as crimes in 2022?
b) What was the outcome of each of these reports (Home Office Outcome)
4a) How many reports of indecent exposure did your police force record as crimes in 2023?
b) What was the outcome of each of these reports (Home Office Outcome)
The table below contains all crimes of 088/09 – Exposure validated in the calendar years between 2020-2024 and the outcomes of each. Some crimes are still being investigated, these have the outcome of new.
|
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Grand Total |
1: Charged |
6 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
17 |
1: Summonsed/postal requisition |
1 |
3 |
|
|
4 |
1A: Alternate offence charged |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
5 |
2: Youth conditional caution |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
5: Offender has died |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
10: Police - formal action not in public interest |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
11: Named suspect below age of criminal responsibility |
|
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
12: Named suspect too ill to prosecute |
|
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
14: Victim declines/unable to support action to identify offender |
2 |
8 |
10 |
4 |
24 |
15: CPS - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
1 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
15: Police - named suspect, victim supports but evidential difficulties |
10 |
13 |
16 |
19 |
58 |
16: Victim declines/withdraws support - named suspect identified |
12 |
8 |
11 |
16 |
47 |
18: Investigation complete no suspect identified |
26 |
27 |
40 |
36 |
129 |
21: Police - named suspect, investigation not in the public interest |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
22: Diversionary, educational or intervention activity, not in public interest to take further action |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
New |
|
|
|
9 |
9 |
Grand Total |
63 |
76 |
89 |
97 |
325 |
Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The APP College of Policing guidance states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced.
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker