Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Enquiry Reference: 4 95 - 24
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
This is a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
My request relates to your forces’ arrest figures for drivers under the influence of drugs and alcohol
I would like to request the following information:
The number of drink driving arrests
The number of drug driving arrests
Please can you provide the numbers broken down year-by-year, featuring monthly data for those years. Up to 30 March 2024, including 2024 data, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
If possible, please also indicate which drug was present in the bloodstream for each drug driving arrest .
The below table shows the number of arrests for alcohol and drugs between 01/01/2019 and 30/03/2024. The below includes those arrests where the arrest reason includes driver related drugs and/or alcohol categories and does not include failures to provide specimens for analysis.
Year/month |
Alcohol |
Drugs |
Grand Total |
2019 |
654 |
532 |
1186 |
Jan |
46 |
39 |
85 |
Feb |
36 |
51 |
87 |
Mar |
60 |
59 |
119 |
Apr |
57 |
54 |
111 |
May |
70 |
52 |
122 |
Jun |
60 |
39 |
99 |
Jul |
52 |
33 |
85 |
Aug |
57 |
37 |
94 |
Sep |
59 |
48 |
107 |
Oct |
40 |
40 |
80 |
Nov |
63 |
42 |
105 |
Dec |
54 |
38 |
92 |
2020 |
555 |
914 |
1469 |
Jan |
62 |
50 |
112 |
Feb |
58 |
51 |
109 |
Mar |
45 |
50 |
95 |
Apr |
33 |
90 |
123 |
May |
35 |
109 |
144 |
Jun |
40 |
74 |
114 |
Jul |
58 |
85 |
143 |
Aug |
50 |
75 |
125 |
Sep |
47 |
65 |
112 |
Oct |
41 |
70 |
111 |
Nov |
48 |
89 |
137 |
Dec |
38 |
106 |
144 |
2021 |
549 |
917 |
1466 |
Jan |
32 |
101 |
133 |
Feb |
27 |
75 |
102 |
Mar |
42 |
92 |
134 |
Apr |
44 |
94 |
138 |
May |
50 |
87 |
137 |
Jun |
47 |
74 |
121 |
Jul |
48 |
45 |
93 |
Aug |
60 |
67 |
127 |
Sep |
49 |
52 |
101 |
Oct |
52 |
76 |
128 |
Nov |
42 |
75 |
117 |
Dec |
56 |
79 |
135 |
2022 |
580 |
762 |
1342 |
Jan |
48 |
82 |
130 |
Feb |
52 |
90 |
142 |
Mar |
51 |
73 |
124 |
Apr |
60 |
69 |
129 |
May |
47 |
62 |
109 |
Jun |
37 |
52 |
89 |
Jul |
56 |
51 |
107 |
Aug |
47 |
43 |
90 |
Sep |
45 |
61 |
106 |
Oct |
39 |
59 |
98 |
Nov |
45 |
64 |
109 |
Dec |
53 |
56 |
109 |
2023 |
583 |
699 |
1282 |
Jan |
34 |
50 |
84 |
Feb |
51 |
60 |
111 |
Mar |
35 |
76 |
111 |
Apr |
56 |
74 |
130 |
May |
67 |
65 |
132 |
Jun |
39 |
57 |
96 |
Jul |
51 |
43 |
94 |
Aug |
56 |
51 |
107 |
Sep |
54 |
64 |
118 |
Oct |
33 |
55 |
88 |
Nov |
35 |
49 |
84 |
Dec |
72 |
55 |
127 |
2024 |
142 |
207 |
349 |
Jan |
45 |
72 |
117 |
Feb |
50 |
58 |
108 |
Mar |
47 |
77 |
124 |
Grand Total |
3063 |
4031 |
7094 |
If possible, please also indicate which drug was present in the bloodstream for each drug driving arrest .
The below table shows the above drug arrests whereby the category of the drug was identified. Please note the only information available to me is drug wipe data that can only detect whether the drug was cannabis or cocaine. All remaining drug arrests are listed as unknown:
Year/Month |
Cannabis |
Cocaine |
Unknown |
Grand Total |
2019 |
157 |
168 |
207 |
532 |
Jan |
10 |
12 |
17 |
39 |
Feb |
17 |
22 |
12 |
51 |
Mar |
19 |
18 |
22 |
59 |
Apr |
25 |
16 |
13 |
54 |
May |
20 |
14 |
18 |
52 |
Jun |
13 |
12 |
14 |
39 |
Jul |
5 |
13 |
15 |
33 |
Aug |
10 |
17 |
10 |
37 |
Sep |
13 |
14 |
21 |
48 |
Oct |
7 |
12 |
21 |
40 |
Nov |
9 |
8 |
25 |
42 |
Dec |
9 |
10 |
19 |
38 |
2020 |
247 |
198 |
469 |
914 |
Jan |
8 |
6 |
36 |
50 |
Feb |
14 |
17 |
20 |
51 |
Mar |
15 |
14 |
21 |
50 |
Apr |
28 |
27 |
35 |
90 |
May |
36 |
25 |
48 |
109 |
Jun |
22 |
12 |
40 |
74 |
Jul |
23 |
28 |
34 |
85 |
Aug |
18 |
13 |
44 |
75 |
Sep |
15 |
10 |
40 |
65 |
Oct |
15 |
9 |
46 |
70 |
Nov |
22 |
14 |
53 |
89 |
Dec |
31 |
23 |
52 |
106 |
2021 |
168 |
139 |
610 |
917 |
Jan |
24 |
16 |
61 |
101 |
Feb |
18 |
12 |
45 |
75 |
Mar |
27 |
21 |
44 |
92 |
Apr |
19 |
16 |
59 |
94 |
May |
15 |
15 |
57 |
87 |
Jun |
14 |
3 |
57 |
74 |
Jul |
10 |
2 |
33 |
45 |
Aug |
7 |
9 |
51 |
67 |
Sep |
4 |
8 |
40 |
52 |
Oct |
10 |
14 |
52 |
76 |
Nov |
12 |
13 |
50 |
75 |
Dec |
8 |
10 |
61 |
79 |
2022 |
56 |
40 |
666 |
762 |
Jan |
9 |
6 |
67 |
82 |
Feb |
5 |
7 |
78 |
90 |
Mar |
6 |
4 |
63 |
73 |
Apr |
5 |
6 |
58 |
69 |
May |
2 |
3 |
57 |
62 |
Jun |
2 |
50 |
52 |
|
Jul |
2 |
49 |
51 |
|
Aug |
3 |
40 |
43 |
|
Sep |
8 |
1 |
52 |
61 |
Oct |
7 |
2 |
50 |
59 |
Nov |
3 |
2 |
59 |
64 |
Dec |
8 |
5 |
43 |
56 |
2023 |
65 |
66 |
568 |
699 |
Jan |
8 |
4 |
38 |
50 |
Feb |
7 |
9 |
44 |
60 |
Mar |
13 |
5 |
58 |
76 |
Apr |
9 |
6 |
59 |
74 |
May |
5 |
9 |
51 |
65 |
Jun |
6 |
11 |
40 |
57 |
Jul |
3 |
3 |
37 |
43 |
Aug |
5 |
4 |
42 |
51 |
Sep |
6 |
58 |
64 |
|
Oct |
2 |
4 |
49 |
55 |
Nov |
3 |
3 |
43 |
49 |
Dec |
4 |
2 |
49 |
55 |
2024 |
3 |
1 |
203 |
207 |
Jan |
2 |
70 |
72 |
|
Feb |
58 |
58 |
||
Mar |
1 |
1 |
75 |
77 |
Grand Total |
696 |
612 |
2723 |
4031 |
Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The Freedom of Information Code of Practice (see below link) states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced. Public authorities are not obliged to accept internal reviews after this date.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-code-of-practice
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker