Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Enquiry Reference: 538- 24
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
I am requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 regarding incidents of counterfeit designer shoes within your jurisdiction. This information is critical for a public awareness campaign I am developing to combat the spread of counterfeit goods.
Specifically, I seek detailed data concerning:
- Brands and models of shoes most frequently reported as counterfeited.
- Trends in counterfeiting of designer shoes over the specified period.
- Geographical breakdown of reported incidents, including any identified hotspots.
- Any notable cases or stories related to the seizure or discovery of counterfeit designer shoes.
I would appreciate if the data could be provided in a digital format (Excel or CSV), which includes:
- Date and location of each reported incident.
- Description of counterfeit goods involved.
- Outcomes of the investigations (e.g., arrests made, goods seized).
Having made enquiries within the Force this is not information we hold and would suggest this would be held by Trading Standards.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The Freedom of Information Code of Practice (see below link) states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced. Public authorities are not obliged to accept internal reviews after this date.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-code-of-practice
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker