Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Enquiry Reference: FOI: 26-25
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
I would like to file an FOI request for the following data, pertaining to the Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme (Clare's Law), for each annual period from 2014* - 2024 inclusive.
Within each period that follows, please could you provide:
How many DVDS requests were received within each period?
|
|
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
|
Ask |
30 |
37 |
65 |
79 |
176 |
277 |
430 |
591 |
777 |
811 |
1087 |
|
Know |
4 |
7 |
131 |
253 |
393 |
510 |
665 |
921 |
1287 |
1179 |
1356 |
How many of those requests within each period were fulfilled?
Below is the volume of applications which resulted in a disclosure. Disclosure includes all those given or transferred to another force to be given.
|
|
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
|
Ask |
11 |
16 |
27 |
38 |
98 |
131 |
203 |
302 |
346 |
305 |
412 |
|
Know |
1 |
6 |
95 |
186 |
243 |
301 |
382 |
473 |
588 |
389 |
521 |
How many of those requests within each period were rejected?
And, if retrievable, reason(s) for rejection?
We can report on how many applications resulted in non-delivery or non-disclosure as below.
Non-delivered can result if the person can’t be located or if they refuse to accept the information.
Non-disclosure could be that there was nothing relevant to disclose, that they are not in a relationship or if the application is a duplicate.
Non-delivered
|
|
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
|
Ask |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
23 |
33 |
72 |
97 |
115 |
101 |
|
Know |
2 |
1 |
5 |
18 |
88 |
114 |
152 |
311 |
435 |
535 |
535 |
Non-disclosure
|
|
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
|
Ask |
15 |
20 |
37 |
37 |
56 |
112 |
194 |
217 |
334 |
391 |
537 |
|
Know |
1 |
2 |
30 |
47 |
57 |
93 |
131 |
137 |
264 |
255 |
224 |
The periods in question are from 01 January to 31 December (inclusive) within each year 2014 - 2024 (2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024).
For example, in 2014, between 01 Jan - 31 Dec inclusive, X DVDS requests were received, X were fulfilled, X were rejected. Of those rejected, X number were rejected owing to X reason, and X were rejected owed to X reason.
*Or as the scheme was implemented – please specific.
Having made enquiries within the Force above is all the information we hold.
Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The Freedom of Information Code of Practice (see below link) states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced. Public authorities are not obliged to accept internal reviews after this date.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-code-of-practice
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker