Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Date: 03/07/25
Enquiry Reference: - FOI 628-25
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
Section 1 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) places two duties on public authorities. Unless exemptions apply, the first duty at Section 1 (1) (a) is to confirm or deny whether the information specified in a request is held. The second duty at Sec 1(1) (b) is to disclose information that has been confirmed as being held. Where exemptions are relied upon s17 of FOIA requires that we provide the applicant with a notice which: a) states that fact b) specifies the exemption(s) in question and c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.
Having made enquiries within the Force due to the nature of our recording systems the information requested, if held, is not in an easily retrievable format. Our information retrieval process generally relies on a computer ran report which captures any information recorded upon the surface of a record. Where relevant information is held deeper in a record a manual assessment is usually required to retrieve that information. In this instance this would require a manual search through all the records and at 2-3 minutes a record this would take in excess of the appropriate time stipulated by the Secretary for Constitutional Affairs, Lord Falconer on the 18th Of October 2004, that is, eighteen hours. This falls under the exemption of 'Compliance exceeding the appropriate limit' covered by Section 12 (1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and as such this work could not be undertaken.
Therefore, please treat this as a refusal notice under S17 of the Freedom of information Act.
In accordance with Section 16 of the Act we have a duty to provide advice and assistance however on this occasion we cannot offer any suggestion on how you could refine this request.
However as a gesture of goodwill outside of the act we have provided the information that was retrieved before it was realised this took over the specified time.
A689 Wynyard 1326
B1365 Middlesbrough 521
Stockton Road, Middlesbrough 492
A689 Coal Lane, Stockton 395
Myton Way, Ingleby Barwick 374
Plantation Road, Redcar 333
A66(W) Teesside Park, Stockton 330
A174 (Lazenby Bypass), Redcar 324
A689 Greatham/Newton Bewley 302
Queen Elizabeth Way, Stockton 276
Mitchell Avenue, Stockton 271
Powlett Road, Hartlepool 267
Park Road North, Middlesbrough 235
A66(E) Surtees Bridge, Stockton 208
West View Road, Hartlepool 206
Easington Road, Hartlepool 185
B1380 Eston 168
Belle Vue Way, Hartlepool 168
Church Lane, Eston 155
Central Avenue, Billingham 151
113mph A689 Greatham – 70mph April 2024
103mph A19 Stockton - 70mph January 2025
97mph A689 Wynyard – 50mph September 2024
95mph A19 Stockton - 70mph August 2024
95mph A19 Stockton - 70mph February 2025
95mph A689 Wynyard – 50mph June 2024
95mph A689 Wynyard – 50mph October 2024
95mph Queen Elizabeth Way Stockton – 50mph November 2024
Having made enquiries within the Force above is all the information we hold. Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The Freedom of Information Code of Practice (see below link) states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced. Public authorities are not obliged to accept internal reviews after this date.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-code-of-practice
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker