Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Date: 11/06/25
Enquiry Reference: 548- 25
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
Answer
Please note that this is a count of crimes and therefore if there is more than one suspect then the crime will only be counted once. If there is an adult and child suspect, then it will be counted in the adult column. If there is no suspect recorded, then it’s counted under unknown.
Some crimes have a suspect recorded but have been closed as no suspect identified. This is due to data quality issues with not recording the person as eliminated for example or them being named only with no evidence.
|
Outcome group |
Adults |
Children |
Unknown |
|
Out-of-court (formal) - i.e. cautions and penalty notices for disorder [outcomes 2,3,6,7] |
132 |
31 |
2 |
|
Out-of-court (informal) - i.e. community resolutions [outcome 8] |
335 |
75 |
5 |
|
Diversionary, educational or intervention activity, resulting from the crime report, has been undertaken and it is not in the public interest to take any further action. [outcome 22] |
439 |
274 |
84 |
|
Charged/Summonsed [outcome 1] |
7480 |
306 |
7 |
|
Evidential difficulties (suspect identified; victim supports action) [outcome 15s – CPS & police] |
8532 |
1157 |
441 |
|
Evidential difficulties (victim does not support action) [outcome 16] |
13680 |
2726 |
573 |
|
Prosecution prevented or not in the public interest [outcomes 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17] |
825 |
219 |
47 |
|
Further investigation to support formal action not in the public interest – police decision [outcome 21] |
19 |
161 |
233 |
|
Responsibility for further investigation transferred to another body [outcome 20] |
411 |
126 |
58 |
|
Taken into consideration [outcome 4] |
7 |
0 |
0 |
|
Investigation complete – no suspect identified [outcomes 14, 18] |
361 |
92 |
30987 |
|
Not yet assigned an outcome |
1813 |
323 |
398 |
Answer
Children where the first disposal from custody was charge and detain for court. Ethnic group is self-defined. Child may have been arrested for more than one crime and the table shows the type of the one recorded as the primary reason.
|
Asian |
Other Minority ethnicity |
White |
Not Stated |
Total children |
|
|
Burglary - Business and Community |
1 |
1 |
2 |
||
|
Burglary - Residential |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
Criminal Damage/Arson |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
Homicide |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
Other non-notifiable |
10 |
10 |
|||
|
Possession of weapons |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
Possession/use of drugs |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
Public order offences |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
Robbery |
2 |
2 |
|||
|
Shoplifting |
1 |
1 |
2 |
||
|
Trafficking of drugs |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
Veh crime inc interference |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
Violence with injury |
6 |
6 |
|||
|
Violence without injury |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
Total charged and detained to court |
1 |
1 |
34 |
1 |
37 |
Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The Freedom of Information Code of Practice (see below link) states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced. Public authorities are not obliged to accept internal reviews after this date.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-code-of-practice
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker