Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Date:28/01/26
Enquiry Reference: 5-26
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, please provide the following information held by your police force.
For the most recent 12-month period for which data is available, please provide the total number of recorded crimes involving the theft of delivered parcels from:
- Residential doorsteps
- Designated "safe places" (e.g. porches, sheds, bins, garages).
Please include:
- A monthly breakdown
- The crime classification or offence code used to record these incidents.
Additional Information
If the term "porch piracy" is not used by your force, please interpret this request using the closest equivalent offence categories (for example, theft from outside a dwelling).
The analyst has created the below based on the crime type ’42 – theft of Mail’, and to identify if the parcel was stolen from a doorstep of ‘safe place’, They have manually read through the MO comments of a crime.
To identify the type of place where the parcel was stolen from, the keyword in the table below is if it is featured in the MO Comments.
|
5 - Parcel Thefts |
2025 |
||||||||||
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
042/00 - Theft of mail bag or postal packet - unlawfully taking away or opening of mail bag |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
|
Bin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Doorstep |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Shed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Having made enquiries within the Force above is all the information we hold. Please note that all statistical data supplied in relation to Freedom of Information requests is a snapshot of data held at the time the request was received by the Freedom of Information office and is subject to constant change/updates.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The Freedom of Information Code of Practice (see below link) states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced. Public authorities are not obliged to accept internal reviews after this date.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-code-of-practice
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker