Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Date: 10/02/26
Enquiry Reference: FOI 62-26
I write in connection with regards to your Freedom of Information request. Below is your request and our response.
I am interested in the period from 1 August 2025 to the present, which reflects when the platform “Grok” began to be used in contexts relevant to safeguarding and potential criminal misuse, including image generation.
Please treat the following as separate but related requests:
1) Recorded offences mentioning “Grok”
For offences recorded by your force during this period, please state the number of crime reports in which the free-text field (sometimes described by forces as the modus operandi or MO field) contains a mention of the word “Grok”.
Please provide a breakdown by offence type.
2) Redacted free-text crime report entries
For the same period, please provide redacted copies of the relevant free-text crime report entries in which “Grok” is mentioned.
I am not requesting personal data. Any information identifying individuals may be redacted as necessary.
3) Use of Grok in connection with recorded offences
Please state whether your force holds any information indicating that “Grok” was used to facilitate, generate, alter or share material relevant to a recorded offence during this period.
Where such information is held, please state how many offences this relates to and, where possible, provide a breakdown by offence category (for example, sexual offences, indecent images, harassment, malicious communications, fraud).
Having made enquiries within the Force our answer on this occasion is no information held.
The Cleveland Police response to your request is unique and it should be noted that Police Forces do not use generic systems or identical procedures to capture and record data therefore responses from Cleveland Police should not be used as a comparison with any other force response you receive.
If you are not satisfied with this response or any actions taken in dealing with your request, you have the right to request an independent internal review of your case under our review procedure. The Freedom of Information Code of Practice (see below link) states that a request for internal review should be made within 20 working days of the date on this response or 40 working days if extenuating circumstances to account for the delay can be evidenced. Public authorities are not obliged to accept internal reviews after this date.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-code-of-practice
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Decision Maker